For those who don’t want to wear a cloche hat with their 1920s outfits, there are many other authentic hat options. One, very popular around 1925, was the Tam-o’-Shanter. It was usually, but not always, worn by younger women, and was usually, but not always, more sporty than a cloche. All of the following Tam-o’-Shanter patterns were featured in Butterick’s Delineator magazine in 1925, although some had first appeared in 1924.
Butterick Tam-o’-Shanter Pattern 5402
The easy ribbon trim, which forms a sort of tassel, looks like it could be pinned into place or secured with beads or buttons. The band could be turned under, as on the left. Popular fabrics for tam-o-shanters included silk velvet, cotton velvet (velveteen or velours,) wool flannel, wool jersey, taffeta, and duvetyn [a fabric with a short nap.] Purely decorative hat pins — Cartier called them “cliquets” — appear on 1920s tams as well as on cloches, or piercing the turned-up front brim of a larger hat.
Here is Tam pattern 5402 illustrated on young teens:
Below is the same tam, #5204, illustrated as worn by an adult; a Butterick embroidery transfer has been used to decorate the both hem of her tunic and the crown of her hat. The tunic is worn over a “costume slip,” i.e., a slip intended to show.
Butterick Tam-o-Shanter Pattern 5416
Again, the tam is illustrated on a youngster, probably for “Girls 8 to 14,” but the pattern was intended for women as well.
Butterick Tam-o’-Shanter Pattern #5458

Tam #5458 worn by a dressed-up Miss, age 15 to 20, and by a younger teen, carrying ice skates. Delineator.
Tam-o’-Shanters were also popular in the 1910s; to read about Tam-O-Shanters for Women, circa 1917, click here.
I’d love one of these!
Some of the illustrations look like a cross between a tam and a cloche. And the term “costume slip” is a new one to me. That’s nice to know.
Pingback: Tams Become Berets: McCall Hat Patterns from 1950 | witness2fashion
Pingback: Dresses for Teens and Young Women, October 1924 | witness2fashion
Pingback: Fun in the Snow, 1921 | witness2fashion
Pingback: Seeing Double on a Suit from 1926 | witness2fashion