I am no authority on tennis or any other sport. I just have a batch of images to share — more than will fit into one post.
When I began playing tennis for fun, around 1971, I thought you were supposed to wear white on the court. In fact, my tennis partner and I felt quite daring because we were wearing the new white-piped-with-color tennis outfits, like this one.
Now, of course, women players like the Williams sisters appear in tournaments wearing comfortable stretch fabrics and brilliant hues. If some of the period illustrations I’ve come across are accurate, wearing white is a fashion that comes and goes (although casual play is different from playing at Wimbledon, where the dress code is strict.)
For informal games in the 1920’s and earlier, both spectators and players apparently had the option of wearing colorful clothing.
A sleeveless version of the red print dress is shown in the background, worn by a tennis player.
“5994: If you omit the sleeves, this slip-over frock makes a smart tennis costume, for the two-piece circular skirt fastened at the hip-line allows freedom for running, etc. ”
Of course, tennis rackets, golf clubs and parasols were often used in pattern illustrations as as way of emphasizing the season, and may not be taken too literally. Another illustration of the blue “golf” dress above (No. 5990) is shown with a tennis racket a few pages later — in a shorter version for a younger wearer. It does not seem well suited for running or leaping.
Nevertheless, prints, stripes, plaids and colors all seem to have been acceptable — possibly chic — in a friendly game.

Masthead illustration of a tennis game, Delineator, July 1928. The model below wears a very similar pleated skirt and patterned top.
Although she has both a racket and tennis balls, her shoes don’t look appropriate for active sports. (Rubber-soled shoes were available. Click here for some vintage Keds.)
How Did They Do It? Some Earlier Tennis Outfits
For photographs of a tennis player actually dressed like this, click here. Playing tennis while wearing a bustle, a corset, petticoats, and long hems, like this, must have required immense agility and balance. Not to mention stamina….
It was quite a handicap, as cartoonist George du Maurier noticed in 1877:

1877 tennis cartoon by Du Maurier. “Charlotte and Ethel, having accepted a Challenge to play against their cousins, Tom and Harry, insist upon Handicapping them, as is only fair.”
Cartoonists also noticed that athletic young women — even those who scorned to play tennis wearing corsets — found male admirers. [Caution: This is a cartoon, from Punch magazine, not a photograph….]

Tennis without corsets, Caricature, 1879. “They have given up stays altogether…. [and] are all engaged to Dukes. “
The idea that a woman’s body should support itself without stays (boned corsets) — thanks to healthy exercise — was a principle of the Jenness-Miller magazine. This is a Jenness-Miller pattern for lawn-tennis, 1890.
Two decades later, British tennis champion Charlotte Cooper Sterry managed not to trip on her skirts, winning five singles titles in outfits like this one:
In 1918, Butterick’s Delineator recommended a colorful two piece outfit:

Butterick patterns for a middy blouse (1033) and striped skirt (9723); tennis costume, July 1918. The skirt is striped, not pleated, although pleats were popular in 1918.
“Behind the tennis net a middy blouse and striped skirt do their part … championship in sport and fashion.”
In this 1925 advertisement, the male player wears white; one woman wears a white middy or dress with pleated (?) skirt, but the other wears lavender –and recognizable tennis shoes.

Indian Head Cloth ad, May 1925. Detail. Most of the women in the background — probably waiting to play — are wearing white.
“Gradually, white for tennis became a rule, so that in 1890 Wimbledon mandated all-white outfits for players. Elsewhere, the all-white tennis outfit became a decorous standard by the early 20th century — just in time, by the way, for the Frenchwoman Suzanne Lenglen to aggravate rich people everywhere by playing tennis in a (white) calf-length skirt and short sleeves.” — Emily Chertoff, writing in The Atlantic. Click here.
(Another theory is that white doesn’t show sweat stains as badly as colored fabrics.)
Champion Suzanne Lenglen wore a longish pleated skirt in this tournament:
Lenglen wore many outfits designed by couturier Jean Patou in the 1920’s, which helped to popularize his sporty sweaters and skirts. Lenglen first appeared at Wimbledon in Patou’s short white silk pleated skirt and a sleeveless cardigan in 1921. According to Brenda Polan & Roger Tredre, her outfit created a sensation and introduced the sporty, boyish look known as the “garçonne.”
“As with so much sportswear, many of [his] clothes were in reality bought by women who did not participate in sport and were more interested in showing off their Patou monogrammed cardigan sweaters to their envious friends.” — Polan and Tredre, in The Great Fashion Designers
Patou took credit for shortening skirts to the knee in 1925; he was one of the first designers to put his monogram very visibly on his designs — monogrammed cardigans, scarves, etc. This was a clever move, since without the monogram his relatively simple sportswear — sweater, skirt, and matching scarf — would not have proclaimed its price. [Sometimes I’d like to go back in a time machine and strangle Patou, but then I realize that somebody else — probably his arch-rival, Chanel — would have invented the merchandising of Monogrammed “Designer” Everything if he hadn’t done it.] For a concise history of Patou, see The Great Fashion Designers, by Polan and Tredre.

The outfit on the right shows Patou’s influence. The woman is wearing tennis shoes and socks, so perhaps she is not merely a spectator. Delineator, May 1929.
If you couldn’t afford couture, you could put your own monogram on your clothing.
(Butterick sold embroidery transfers for alphabets as well as sewing patterns.)
The influence of Patou, as stated by Polan and Tredre, may explain why it’s not always easy to tell spectator sportswear from active sportswear in fashion illustrations. Which of these ladies are playing, and which are spectators?
More about these patterns later.
For a slide show of historic tennis dress at Wimbledon, click here. K. Shriya Sharma has written a chronology of women’s Wimbledon fashions in the Times of India. Click here to read it.
What amazing images! I particularly love the one where the men are handicapped by women’s clothes.
This is fantastic. I love the Lenglen outfit and think it was free enough for movement. I hope you will cover “gorgeous Gussie” and her frilly underwear next time!
Glad you like it. I think some of the links I included show Gussie in her shockingly frilly under shorts.
Interesting article, thank you – you have put in a lot of research! Can’t wait for part 2.
Some comments….
1. We don’t always see the signifance of tennis and tennis clubs today. In the late 19 / early 20 centuries they represented a major liberation for women. Girls could go there either unchaperoned, or “chaperone lite” because all members (male and female) had to be approved by the membership committee. Therefore, dear mothers, your daughter was safe at the tennis club.
2. Tennis clubs were often more social than tennis – in the dark English winters they had dances, social evenings etc. An ideal way for girls and boys to mingle without parental oversight. Remember that before 1914 it was normal for the father of the household to open and read all incoming letters – wife, daughters etc.
3. The game of tennis itself was a great liberator for women – long skirts, bustles, tight waists all disappeared, but it took a long time. I’ve seen circa 1910 advice to male tennis players that in mixed games (much more significant than today!) that men should not return shots to women that would not need an overarm response. Their corsets and dresses with small tight armholes would make raising the arm higher than the shoulder difficult. Gentlemen should return shots that could be played under arm.
…anyone for tennis? …D
Thanks for the information about “tennis clubs.” I have no personal experience of the “country club life,” but the idea of only meeting “our kind of people” is a factor in both. The Vintage Traveler is a specialist in women’s sportswear; I just like to share pictures that I find interesting! One of her readers commented on the rules for men playing against women.
Hello, I apologize if this caught you a bit surprised.
I would just like to talk about what you said about number 3.
Since the statement about armholes is interesting in that it may not necessarily have prevented them from raising their arms higher than the shoulder
I am assuming when you mention small tight armholes, you mean that their armholes are cut higher (since that is how I interpreted it, correct me if I am wrong)
The general consensus now is the bodices during that era/decade, the armholes are cut higher compared to the armholes in most of our clothes today.
Since a higher armhole allows for a wider range of movement compared to the lower or bigger armholes in most of the clothes we have today. (Especially in the situation when the sleeves and/or bodice are slim-fitting)
To test this notice when you move your arms above your head, the shirt/ garments move upwards as well. Especially when the garment is a bit more form-fitting
(Sorry I am not that good at explaining. I just hope that you may get what I am saying)
Though this may help explain it as well:
https://www.parisiangentleman.com/blog/the-armscye-height-secret-a-crucial-detail?fbclid=IwAR0fHO_hXKors6wi4viV_pFLjiusEP09XIF_whRrZs71KssRRgQ94Q-bpzY
https://www.anatolys.com/blogs/from-the-journal/armhole-secrets
Actually, it was a reader who commented about armholes. I totally agree with the twosome articles about the armscye in men’s jackets. There’s quite a contrast between the American “Brooks Brothers” suit with its loose fitting armholes and the “European” cut, which fits closer to the body and permits more movement. A friend who works in film told me that the jeans worn for Kungfu stunts in movies were often custom made to be sure the crotch was higher than is store-bought jeans. Doing the splits and high kicks requires tight, rather than loose, clothing.
However, I’ve written elsewhere about the top of the armhole in 1920s dresses. In the 1960s, also, a sleeveless dress sometimes covered the shoulder bone and sometimes was cut in to bare the shoulder bone, a look which always looked more youthful to me. It also makes the bare arm look more slender. I am referring to daytime styles. Evening armhole styles were very bare in 20’s dresses.
Also if it may interest you, many fashion historians, historical costumers and Reenactors discuss the history and the experiments regarding women’s sporting clothes of the 19th century and the Edwardian era.
They show the nuance of the topic of women’s clothing and sports back then and do demonstrate that women can do sports ( in this case tennis) while wearing the clothes ( and underwear) of that era/decade without any major impediment. Though of course, there is the factor that women did choose, adapt and/or make their clothing specifically for the purpose of sport/activewear for this to happen
These 2 videos are a great introduction to the topic because other than they give sources to their research.
They also do a bit of experimental archaeology by making garments of the period and wearing them with all the underwear (i.e. corsets and petticoats) and accessories that would have been worn from that time. Then show how it affects their movement and/or the ability to do the specific stated physical activity ( be it tennis, croquet, horseback riding, cycling, etc…)
Hello, I apologize if this caught you a bit surprised.
I would just like to talk about what you said about number 3.
Since the statement about armholes is interesting in that it may not necessarily have prevented them from raising their arms higher than the shoulder
I am assuming when you mention small tight armholes, you mean that their armholes are cut higher (since that is how I interpreted it, correct me if I am wrong)
The general consensus now is the bodices during that era/decade, the armholes are cut higher compared to the armholes in most of our clothes today.
Since a higher armhole allows for a wider range of movement compared to the lower or bigger armholes in most of the clothes we have today.
(Especially in the situation when the sleeves and/or bodice are slim-fitting)
To test this notice when you move your arms above your head, the shirt/ garments move upwards as well. Especially when the garment is a bit more form-fitting
(Sorry I am not that good at explaining. I just hope that you may get what I am saying)
Though this may help explain it as well:
https://www.parisiangentleman.com/blog/the-armscye-height-secret-a-crucial-detail?fbclid=IwAR0fHO_hXKors6wi4viV_pFLjiusEP09XIF_whRrZs71KssRRgQ94Q-bpzY
https://www.anatolys.com/blogs/from-the-journal/armhole-secrets
Also if it may interest you, many fashion historians, historical costumers, and Reenactors discuss the history and the experiments regarding women’s sporting clothes of the 19th century and the Edwardian era.
They show the nuance of the topic of women’s clothing and sports back then and do demonstrate that women can do sports ( in this case tennis) while wearing the clothes ( and underwear) of that era/decade without any major impediment. Though of course, there is the factor that women did choose, adapt and/or make their clothing specifically for the purpose of sport/activewear for this to happen
These 2 videos are a great introduction to the topic because other than they give sources to their research.
They also do a bit of experimental archaeology by making garments of the period and wearing them with all the underwear (i.e. corsets and petticoats) and accessories that would have been worn from that time. Then show how it affects their movement and/or the ability to do the specific stated physical activity ( be it tennis, croquet, horseback riding, cycling, etc…)
Loved these, of course. You are right that the fashion illustrations should not be taken too literally. By the 1920s proper tennis dress was always white, though depending on where the court was located that rules was not always followed. I looked through my vintage photos of women tennis players in the 1920s, and all made an attempt to wear white, though other colors were often added.
Interestingly, for golf, one never wears all white, but I’ve seen plenty of vintage illustrations showing golfers in white!
Fascinating! I had never heard about golfers not wearing all-white — You’d think that any sport played in the hot sun would be easier in white clothes. When I lived in a city with 100 degree summers, I could really feel the difference between a black shirt and a white shirt in full sun.
Pingback: Paris Fashions from The Delineator, 1929. Part 1, Daytime | witness2fashion
Pingback: Patou’s Evening Gowns for Short and Tall, 1936 | witness2fashion
Pingback: Embroidery Ideas from 1927: Sports Motifs and More | witness2fashion
Pingback: White Dresses for Summer, July 1931 | witness2fashion
Pingback: Summer Fashions and More from July, 1937 | witness2fashion
Oh sorry, I did not mean to reply to you, because I am not yet that knowledgeable on writing comments on this kind of website
I was trying to write a reply to the other poster. Though thank you very much for sharing your insight and knowledge on the topic.
I will write my comment/s again but for person I was suppose to reply to