There were two big changes in 1914. The corset is no longer expected to support the bust, and the days of the wasp waist are over.
The 1912 corset was higher and longer, and it made the waist smaller; the corset of 1914 is below the bust, and does not constrict the waist. These are both advertisements from the same corset company, less than 3 years apart.
Delineator ran an article about the corsets of 1914, and it may surprise you (as it did me) to see these early references to the natural, girlish figure.
“The corset of former years gave a woman a mature, well-developed, matronly figure. The corset of to-day makes her look like a very young girl.” [I find the 1914-1918 figure very un-girlish, but….”fashion writing.”]
“This is the day of the …drooping, boneless pose,” the body “as straight and yielding as a very young girl’s.” That sounds like the 1920s, but it was written before World War I. “The silhouette … for 1914 … is the straight figure, with small hips, large waist, and no bust.”
These corsets “compress the hips as much as possible,” “leaving the bust absolutely free, letting out the waist to its normal size….” “Practically unboned, …The softness of the material follows the natural curve of the abdomen, …and in many cases there is even a slight curve in the front bone.”
“Among smart women the size of the waistline has increased three inches in the past three or four years. Large women still cling to their waistlines, but the corset should only measure two inches less than the waist — a twenty-four inch corset for a twenty-six inch waist.” — Eleanor Chalmers in Delineator, April 1914.
As seen in the corset back illustration above, a gap between the sides of the corset was customary, so this corset did not decrease the waist measurement at all.
Since the 1914 corset started below the bust, some women felt the need to wear a brassiere. However, the brassiere of 1914 “confined” the bust, rather than supporting it.
The back waist of the brassiere was much higher than the front, reflecting the posture of the period, which was changing, but not yet completely natural. (The long center front tab attaches to the corset to keep the brassiere anchored down in front.)Less constrictive brassieres were available, offering no support, just nipple coverage..
Not all women wore brassieres. These fashions suggest the “absolutely free,” natural bust of 1914:
“The uncorseted effect is produced by leaving the bust absolutely free, letting out the waist to its natural size and in the hip-confining sections of the corset using a very soft, pliable, practically unboned material that leaves the figure almost as soft and supple as if no corset were worn.” — Eleanor Chalmers in Delineator, April 1914.
However, stout women were advised to wear a brassiere with the low-waisted 1914 corset:
“…Appear ‘uncorseted’ without looking slovenly…. Your corset will not make a ‘ridge’ in your gown.” Bulging flesh at the top of the corset (in front or in back) must have been a problem for many women.
Three years after 1914, corsets were still higher in the back than in the front. A ridge of flesh above the corset was often a problem, except for the very slender. A brassiere helped control the back bulge, as well as a possible overflow in front.
Again, it’s hard to see why the corset of 1914 had to compress the hips during the “tunic” era. But the corset did affect posture. And some women chose a sleeker silhouette, without the tunic:
Quick comparison 1907 to 1914:
Styles to come: The low, natural-waist-size corset of 1914 was still fashionable in 1917, but it was getting shorter and less rigid.
For a previous post about the change in fashionable figures from 1914 to 1924, click here.
For corset change between 1907 and 1910, click here.
For corset change between 1910 and 1912, click here.
NOTE: I am not writing an authoritative history of corsets, just offering images from one or two sources in the hope that serious researchers will find them helpful. I have chosen extremes for the sake of contrast, but women could choose from a wide range of styles, and many continued to wear their old corsets until they wore out.
Your articles on the evolution of the corset have been absolutely fascinating. Thank you so much.
Thank you for taking the time to comment. I didn’t realize how many ads I had collected till I started trying to organize them.
I continue to be aghast at what women felt they had to put up with. Implements of torture! 🧐
Here are some real-life examples of early brassieres. There are lots more on my blog. https://sewingvintage.blogspot.com/2012/07/brassieres-of-teens.html
Thanks for the link! Your version of the one with a slight gathering at the side is prettier than the illustration I found. Thanks for the much repaired side view. And your corseted shape really does look like the woman in Delineator’s 1912 corset photo!
This series has been fascinating! Thanks so much.