Stocking Memories, 1958 to 1960

Stockings and a girdle from Sears catalog for Fall 1958.

When I started high school around 1958, we wore stockings for dress-up occasions. Usually, those stockings had a seam up the back.

Seamed stockings from Sears, Spring 1960.

(Pantyhose became available in 1959, or so the internet tells me. Seamless nylon or rayon stockings were available — briefly — in the 1940s, but in 1958, seams were the norm for me and the adult women I knew.)

Seamless stockings advertised in Vogue, Aug. 15, 1943.

Of course, stockings are still available and worn by many women, but pantyhose have dominated the market for about 50 years now.

So, for those who never had the dubious pleasure of buying stockings in the 1950s….

A run in her stocking; Lux soap ad from October 1937. Runs looked the same in 1960: a hole with unraveled knit stocking above and below it.

At the Stocking Counter

Perhaps the most astonishing thing about stockings circa 1958 was how many choices you had to make. Faced with the stocking counter — at a department store or even a “five and dime store” — you would see rows and rows of distinctive shallow boxes, each originally holding 6 pairs of stockings. The pairs were separated by layers of tissue; you could buy one pair, incurring the barely concealed scorn of the clerk who waited on you, or two or three pairs of matching stockings (if you could afford them.) Buying the whole box was a wonderful extravagance. Stockings were so fragile that the clerks sometimes wore gloves.

For a young teen, it was a confusing process. You needed to know your size, your “proportion,” the denier, the color, “seam or no-seam,” reinforced heel and toe or sandal foot, knit or “run stop”mesh….

1958 stocking size chart from the Sears catalog.

“What size?” Stockings came in seven sizes. Your stocking size was related to your shoe size, but it wasn’t the same as your shoe size. [Shoes used to come in many sizes and widths, from AAAA (very narrow) to EEE (very wide.)  I wore a shoe size 7 1/2, B width, with a (double) AA heel [Yes, you could buy a wide shoe size with a narrow heel, or many other variations.] As you can imagine, shoe stores had to carry almost as much stock as stocking counters.]

In 1958, your stocking size depended on your shoe size and your shoe width: shoe size 7, width B = stocking size 10.

However, stockings were usually held up by garters (aka suspenders) attached to a garter belt or girdle.

Garter belts, Sears 1958. Also (more accurately) called suspender belts in England.

Top left is a girdle; all the others are panty-girdles. Notice that your stocking top would need to come quite high on the thigh to attach to these garters.

Stockings attach high on the leg, with one garter in front and one in back on this panty-girdle. Sears, 1958.

The suspender part was somewhat adjustable in length, but you had to buy stockings that were long enough to reach the garter comfortably.

Proportioned Stockings for tall women; Sears, 1958. “The extra length reduces garter pull and strain…”

Finding the right proportioned stocking for your height and weight. Sears chart, 1958.  At Sears, your four proportion choices were “petite, shapely, classic, or tall.” (7 sizes x 4 lengths = 28 choices!)

There were so many size variations because 1950s’ stockings did not have much “stretch.” To answer the question “What size?” you needed to know your stocking size and your “pattern” or proportion. (Or you could tell the clerk your height and weight.)

If you wanted long enough stockings, you might have to pay more.

Sears, 1958. The cheaper stockings came in 15 or 30 denier weight, but only one length.

College memory: A friend named Mary was standing in the doorway when my roommate said, “Mary, your stockings are all wrinkled around your ankles.” Mary said, “I’m not wearing stockings. My ankles are sagging.”

Before modern stretch knits, stockings might bag or sag. Worse, if the reinforced top wasn’t high enough, when you knelt down the pull of the suspender could put too much strain on the knee, and your stocking would run or “pop.” Cheap stockings didn’t come in a full range of lengths, so I sometimes came out of church with one or both knees bulging out of big holes in my stockings. All those sizes were necessary because stockings were not very stretchy.

Stocking runs: a tiny hole would unravel the stocking both up and down your leg. This was still true in the 1960s. Lux soap claimed to improve stockings’ elasticity. Ad from 1936.

The stocking clerk might ask, “What weight?” This meant, not your own weight, but the amount of sheerness or strength you needed in the stocking. Light weight 15 denier was very sheer. 30 denier was more durable for everyday wear, and even thicker stockings were available.

“Seams or seamless?” My first stockings had seams, but the seams on the soles of my feet sometimes gave me blisters, so once I discovered seamless stockings, I always bought those. Seamless stockings were available in 1958, but I didn’t discover them for a couple of years. (A vertical seam up the back would have been more flattering to my sturdy legs, but limping on blisters didn’t improve my looks or disposition, so I chose comfort over vanity.) Besides, it’s maddening to be down to your last two intact stockings when you’re dressing for work and find that one of them has a seam and the other doesn’t.

Seamed stockings with reinforced heel and toe (and a seam under the ball of your foot.) Sears, Spring of 1958.

“Reinforced toe and heel? Sandal heel? Sheer foot?” If you wore pumps, then you could buy longer-lasting stockings with reinforced heels and toes. (Toenails or rough heels were hard on stockings.) However, by the 1940s many women wore open-toed or strap-heeled shoes, making the less durable options necessary.

Nude heel or reinforced heel in seamless stockings, Sears, 1958.

“Run stop or regular?” Runs were always a problem. A tiny snag from a chair or a fingernail would start a run racing up and down your leg. Many women kept a bottle of clear nail polish in their purse or desk drawers, because it was the only thing that could stop a run from progressing. If you dabbed a bit on the run before it passed the hem of your skirt, then the stocking might be salvaged enough for future wear. Otherwise, sheer stockings couldn’t be mended. One reason for always buying several identical pairs at the same time: as long as you had two stockings that matched, you could wear them. Once you were down to one stocking, you would probably never find a matching color or knit again, (too many brands, too many choices) so the final stocking might as well be tossed out.

Rayon mesh stockings from Sears, 1944. “Lockstitch resists runs, snags.”

Run-proof stockings were usually a mesh knit. They did get holes, but they didn’t get runs. The holes, however,  kept getting bigger….

Mesh stockings did not run, but they did get holes. And the weave was rather coarse and noticeable. Sears’ seamless mesh stockings from 1942.

“What color?” Stocking manufacturers and fashion magazines urged women to buy stockings to match every outfit. However, the woman on a budget often stuck to one or two shades. We all had drawers full of not-qute-matching stockings (usually kept in a padded box within the drawer.) Sticking to just one color matching your skin tone (or the healthy tan color you wished your legs were) was the economical choice. However, those black or dark stockings for evening were so temptingly glamourous….

Stockings from Sears to match your skin tone or your dress. 1959 catalog.

If you bought the last pairs of stockings in the box, or the whole box (six pairs,) you would be given the box itself, and therefore you would know the brand and color when you needed to buy more stockings a few weeks later.  Otherwise, stockings were simply wrapped in tissue. It was easy to forget where you bought them, the brand, and the name of the color, so your supply of single, unmatched, surviving stockings continued to grow. (One maker’s “nude” or “taupe” was rarely the same as another’s, and “suntan” could mean anything from light golden brown (in expensive brands) to orange (cheaper brands) ….

One Christmas in the Sixties, my father gave me a nightgown set that I didn’t need, so I took it back to Macy’s and exchanged it for a dozen pairs of stockings — two whole boxes! I had several blissful months of not worrying whether I had a pair of stockings that matched. Such luxury!

Next: The Pantyhose Revolution and Supermarket Stockings.



Filed under 1950s-1960s, 1960s-1970s, Girdles, Hosiery, Hosiery, Hosiery & Stockings, Musings, Old Advertisements & Popular Culture, Underthings, Hosiery, Corsets, etc

27 responses to “Stocking Memories, 1958 to 1960


    What a lot of memories! By the time that I wore stockings most of the time, they were fairly inexpensive, and it was easy to find the nude heel varieties in less expensive brands. When pantyhose became available, I immediately pronounced them “one of the two best inventions of the century.” (The other in my mindat that time was the automatic washing machine.) I still think women’s legs look far better in stockings or pantyhose than going bare-legged as seems to be the fashion now.

    • Right! 20 years ago no well dressed

    • …no well dressed woman would have appeared in an evening gown and bare legs. Stockings and pantyhose with sheer toes and heels were available. Of course, ladies were not generally naked under their dress…. and normal people did not dress as if they were appearing on the red carpet. Also, it wasn’t normal to share photos of yourself and your friends and your children with millions of strangers. Different world….

  2. Val

    I was so glad when tights (panty hose) came into being and into fashion. I hated wearing stockings. Also hated having to fix runs with clear nail varnish!

  3. Val

    By the way, I know it probably seems counterproductive but you’ll get more attention to your posts if you use less tags. I used to help out on the forums here, so have a bit of help:

    • Didn’t know that! I wonder if that explains why I so often get frustrated when searching some of my favorite blogs? Limiting categories is a good idea.

      • Val

        Really tags need only show the content of a post, so that if someone searches, they then get – spot on – what they want to find. 🙂 Best, also, to keep them to just one or two words.

  4. anna

    I live in S. Europe and last summer I went through fire and water trying to find a slip of any description, half or full. Shop after shop told me they don’t sell them anymore, there’s no market for them! I guess girls just let it all see through these days. I did finally find a half-slip; if I ever need another one I guess I’ll have to make it myself–if I can find the fabric. As more and more women work full time, the fabric stores are closing right and left as well.

    • I was thinking about slips, too. I live in California and I thought, “I should

    • … Re: slips. I thought I should go to my nearest department stores and look for slips in the lingerie departments. Then I remembered that Macy’s and Nordstrom both closed recently. Slips were simultaneously modest and sexy. And they helped to prevent your garter bumps from showing through a tight skirt. Maybe pantyhose contributed to the demise of slips?

    • Try asking for shape wear, those are the new slips. I don’t like them because I wear slips to help the clothes drape, not to hide anything, but it’s something. Here in Northern Europe, slips are very easy to find, so you can always order online from a German shop if you’re up against it.

    • If you can’t find a slip at the local thrift/charity shop, your friendly vintage seller likely has a wide selection. I stick several and wear mine all the time, both full and half. And I never get dressed up without hose (usually pantyhose and occasionally stockings). They’re still around, you just have to know where to look!

  5. High school memories! I really hated stockings. Panty hose seemed like a gift from the gods.

    • Since I started wearing trousers all the time, I have been happily free of pantyhose for about 20 years. Then, last month, my doctor told me to wear graduated compression stockings after an injury. They help my knees, but getting into graduated compression tights is misery, even after struggling into pantyhose for forty years. Darn!

  6. i remember my mum using the clear nail polish on runs in her panty-hose in the 70s…every woman seemed to have a bottle of it handy for just that.

    i grew up with the pantyhose as the only option; finding stockings was rather difficult in my area (and pre-internet) as nobody seemed to wear them. in the 80s they came out with ‘stay-ups’, the stockings with silicone grips under a band of lace at the top, and those seem still very popular. i wore those exclusively from my senior year of high school, making exceptions only for my beloved fishnet tights and the occasional pair of wooly tights in winter…

    later i found the silicone was irritating my skin, so i switched to suspender belts and traditional stockings. i love them—i wear all sorts, from pointelle knit cotton to durable, sensible lisle in various colours, to run-if-you-look-at-them-crosseyed silk. i always hated the pantyhose; they felt suffocating to me, and the waistband was so high and uncomfortable. i am very happy that garter/suspender and stockings are so available and diverse now.

    what really hit me about your memories was the description of how nuanced one’s shoe (and stocking) fit could be…i would love shoes with a narrow heel and average-to-wide front!

  7. Black Tulip

    Fascinating information about stocking sizes. A friend who is only 5 years older than I am can still remember what size stocking she took. However by the time I graduated from wearing knee socks, stockings had been entirely replaced by pantyhose, so I never needed to know this.

    Also, slips. It seems impossible to get fitted slips these days – where I live at least they are all stretch fabric or bias cut, so no bust shaping at all. Thank goodness for vintage ones!

  8. Anne S.

    My mother (who is 96 now) I remember had what were called ‘hosiery gloves’ which were sheer nylon gloves meant to protect the stockings from rough hands, hangnails, etc. etc. when you were putting them on.

  9. Pingback: The Pantyhose Revolution and Supermarket Stockings | witness2fashion

  10. stockingfanBill

    i remember my neighbor lady and another lady i delivered newspapers to in the early 80s, who would unhook their stockings from their garters in the summer and just roll them down around their upper calfs. and in the late 80s there was a nurse where i used to give blood who loved to wear stockings and a garter belt. you could see the garter straps and clips outlines through her dress when she would twist and bend. one of the best reasons to keep giving blood!

    • When I was in college I was fascinated by the relative absence of garter belts in America’s Playboy magazine and their constant appearance in European-based men’s magazines. Chacun a son gout!

  11. Robert

    What glorious research for an author!
    It also took me back. Even being a boy, we still all heard about these thing, and the prolkems, and saw them displayed in the department stores. Oh, those were the days, huh?
    Great website!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.