We take small, portable cameras for granted. But one hundred years ago, Kodak was putting pocket sized cameras into the hands of people who never had them before — including the men and boys who volunteered to fight in World War I.
When the United States entered the war in April of 1917, training camps were still being built — including Camp Fremont, in what is now Menlo Park, California. For teen-aged girls like my mother’s older sister and her friends, it was both a patriotic duty and a pleasure to meet homesick young men from all over the country. And, judging from the photos I inherited from my aunt, “the boys” did enjoy sending pictures of their daily activities to family and friends.
Here she is with Wentworth Prescott Gann, in 1918:Pictures reassured soldiers’ families, and were also a pretext for corresponding with new friends. (“I’d love a copy of that photo with you….” or “Here’s a copy of that picture we took at the beach….”)
Because Camp Fremont was still under construction in 1917, many of the soldiers who trained there did not get sent overseas. However, some unfortunate members of the 8th Division were sent to Siberia after the Russian Revolution of 1917. They were on active duty for months after World War I came to an end.
This photo of a luckier group was made into a postcard — probably everyone in it sent a copy home. I believe it is a group of bakers, with my uncle Holt (the soldier my aunt eventually married) leaning against a post in the center. I’m sure a picture like this would reassure worried families that their menfolk were safe and well. And perhaps, a bit bored….
Even schoolgirls like my aunt took (and sometimes printed) their own photos.
I was always puzzled by how tiny (about 2″ by 3″) many of these old photos are. Finally, I found a full page ad in the Ladies Home Journal that gave me a hint: to save money, many people used their contact prints — made directly from the negative — but never bought enlargements. (In my aunt’s case, she made her own duplicate contact prints for friends.)
The contact prints, made by putting the negative directly on the photo paper without using an enlarger, were actually about two by three inches. The paper used for contacts feels flimsier than normal photo prints.I was not able to photograph the magazine page at actual size, so I took a photo of the whole page and then made this “relative size” image of the contact print and the enlargement.
Different cameras used different sized film, so those little contact prints came in a range of sizes. A roll of film for the Vest Pocket Kodak cost twenty cents in 1917 and made eight exposures.
Although most people on the home front, especially in the U.S., had no idea of the horrors of the First World War, a tone of sadness, or at least, of solemnity, affected even Kodak’s Christmas season advertising in wartime.
The ad was referring to taking pictures indoors, but a reference to “its allies” in the text is a reminder of the war.
“With its allies, the Kodak flash sheets and a Kodak flash sheet holder….” As in fashion writing, allusions to the war crept in everywhere, even when it wasn’t mentioned specifically.
And here, as our dessert, is that lovely pink silk dress in better detail:
Great post! really interesting – and poignant
So fascinating, Susan! I hope you are considering a library or archive for your photos in the future. Those shots of soldiers are priceless.
I keep meaning to look up the young men in the photos — but my aunt’s spelling is rather erratic. I do mean to get the images online in case they have descendants looking for them. Another unfinished project….
Pingback: Vintage Kodak Ads and Vintage Photos | witness2fashion